Trevor Williams

Seeming to forget that it is not (yet?) a U.S. state and actually a different country, Mexico has joined the lawsuits against Arizona’s SB1070, claiming to have constitutional "concerns" with the bill. Their lawyers claim that a law that concerns exclusively aliens in the US somehow endangers "citizens' rights."

This, of course, in spite of Mexico’s history of having much harsher laws than the US in terms of citizenship enforcement. In Mexico, illegal immigration was a criminal offense until 2008, but this has been reduced to a "civil violation" which some say is a policy similar to Arizona’s new law.

Mexican President Calderon claims that SB1070 will open up "a Pandora’s Box of the worst abuses in the history of humanity," but in his country, treatment of illegals occurs that is unheard of stateside. According to Amnesty International, aliens from South and Central America can face rape and kidnappings, and Mexican police will do nothing about it, except perhaps demand bribes for the release of captured illegals.

As always, Gov. Brewer has stood strong against her opposition. She took the offensive on the Mexican claims, citing that the status quo is putting Americans in danger because of the "relentless and daily barrage of narco-terrorist drug and human smugglers." These same forces are now digging in and annexing parts of Southern Arizona. Let’s make sure we turn them back before they get further.

As if SB1070 and reforming its educational programs weren't enough (not to say that it is), Arizona has proven itself to be the pioneer for promoting the politics that will save our country. Now lawmakers in Arizona are taking the first steps in righting a constitutional misinterpretation that had been giving children of illegals citizenship. As Russel Pearce states of the 14th Ammendment: "They use it as a wedge. This is an orchestrated effort by them to come here and have children to gain access to the great welfare state we've created."

Pearce promised that "We will write it right."

This law shows both courage and foresight on the part of Arizona Lawmakers, and the latter is something that has been lacking for conservatives for awhile.

Check out the biased article from Yahoo:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20100611/us_time/08599199606400

Also, see Russel Pearce talking about the Anchor Babies insanity on The O'Reilly Factor.

The left once vigorously attacked the old Western morality on the basis that it expected women to dress with a degree of restrictiveness and modesty.  To them, women dressing like this was the result of puritanical social mores and the patriarchal hierarchy, and these things had to be discarded along with normal sexual values, where the act is directed toward or at least does not inhibit the procreative process, women’s different role in the work force, and healthy, complimentary male-female relationships.

These were replaced by the perilous gender wars, which some are saying women won.  Of course, this “battle for equality” was nothing more than a front for undermining American and Western society at its very root: the family.  It paved way for the pornography, increase in divorces, and decrease in births that have since plagued our culture.

The left undoubtedly launched these tendencies, as they were propagated in the same 60s revolution that brought us the drug decriminalization movement, movements propagating perversion as a “lifestyle,” and movements against the Constitution’s Freedom of Association.  Despite this truth, the left has occasionally feigned concern that porn and provocative dress are “sexually exploitive” and “reinforcing the patriarchy.”  This, of course, is nothing more than a clever tactic to mask their intentions and bring those who would otherwise be revolted and extremely opposed to their intentions unwittingly over to their side.

Dastard lies such as this are not uncommon coming from the left though, and countless more examples of these types of tricks could be produced, but this is not the point of this article.  Rather, it is to unmask their true intent.

Recently, Ohio University’s Backdrop Magazine, produced a swimsuit edition of their magazine, including eight models.  One campus feminist, Bethany Francis, became enraged upon seeing this, and took a new angle in attempting to spread her vitriol.  Rather than attack the magazine as “sexually exploitive,” which is, again, counterintuitive to the left’s actual intent, she attacked the magazine as “Aryan.”  Bethany decided this because apparently most of the models were blondes and because, as she admits:

“This makes me feel bad about my body.” I was in no way looking at the suits that these women were wearing; I was immediately comparing my body to theirs and angrily hating mine/theirs at the same time.”

The point of this article, again, is not to ridicule the left’s pitiful use of Godwin’s Law, but rather to show that the logic of their arguments have come circle.  It was once the claim of the left that women should celebrate their bodies, but clearly we see one of its minions complaining about exactly that, saying it makes her “feel bad.”  While the left’s intent is usually masked, in this case we actually get a glimpse of what it really is.  Bethany’s problem with the shoot was not the usual “sexually exploitive” or “male patriarchy” cover, rather, her problem with it was that it had too many white women. And more than that, attractive ones.  It probably rang through her mind, simply upon seeing the cover, this is full of dumb blonde *******.

Her use of the historical word ‘Aryan’ makes her attacks more explicitly racial than if she had just used white.  Imagine the outcry that would be heard if a student wrote that the “Zulus” on BET made him “feel bad” or if he said that the “Incan” illegals made him “angrily hating.”

Quite sadly, Backdrop Magazine, actually apologized because of Bethany’s ranting.

Whether it was the left’s intent all along to eventually resort to these blatantly race-based attacks, or they are simply looking for new material now that studies show that women around the world are resisting their efforts to change their modesty laws, is unclear.  Bethany, though, seemed to reveal their true intentions here.

In a speech at the Kremlin on June 2, Dmitri Medvedev made an important announcement regarding Russia's future. "For the first time in recent decades ... the birth rate in our country has started to rise," said Medvedev, citing a 1.5 percent increase in the number of births as compared to the first quarter in 2009. Although the population still experienced decline in this quarter, forecasters believe that this still represents a positive trend.

Russia went the way of other "free" Western countries after the fall of the Soviet Union, as its population declined by over 6 million from the collapse to 2009, when the government began taking direct political measures to reverse the trend. These efforts bore immediate effects and have now shown continued positive results.

Medvedev has also awarded several "Orders of Parental Glory" to parents raising large families. This year, eight families were awarded the prestigious medal, including a couple from Tartarstan that is raising eight children. The Nikolenko family from Krasnodar is raising 6 children of their own and has taken up 19 foster children, and Nikolai and Tatyana Saltykov, who live near Moscow, are raising 17 of their own kin.

The Duggar family, made up of 19 children, has not complained that Obama has not awarded them a medal since they get their own TV show.

In other news from Russia, Vladimir Putin has officially announced that he is not gay. When questioned by a reporter about his "political marriage" to Medvedev, Putin answered that he and Medvedev are of a "traditional orientation" and are "friends." This response confused homosexual blogger Andy Towle, as in his world, it is not "politically correct" for males to have platonic friendships.

More photos from the Order of Parental Glory ceremony can be seen here.

Things don't seem to be going Barack Obama's way as of late.  The man who was hailed by the media as the harbinger of "change" in Washington and America is no longer seen as the faultless idealist once thought. Rather, in just this last week Obama has proven that cynical cronyism, frustration during crisis, and political divisiveness are not only still the norm but more prevalent than ever, and for our political class as it now stands, there is no light at the end of the tunnel.

First, the curtain was raised on the Obama administration's plan to pay back their buddy Arlen by offering his opponent, Congressman Joe Sestak, a job.  Similar reports then came from another Senate candidate, Andrew Romanoff.  He too had been offered a job so the White House could have their man, but it was done more informally.

Obama's response to the Gulf oil spill has drawn harsh criticism, especially from the Left.  During his presidential campaign, Obama vigorously attacked President Bush's handling of Hurricane Katrina's aftermath, telling the residents of New Orleans that the government would "never again" allow a crisis there to be handled incompetently. Somehow they find Obama's golf vacation less than inspiring.

Recently, Obama has changed his tune a bit by expressing his fury to Larry King about BP. Although he promised to do something other than just "vent," the government is allowing BP to handle the cleanup for now, despite calls from the Left and "Right" for Washington to do something more substantial.  Shockingly, some have declared the "only solution" is to "blow the oil spill shut" with a nuclear bomb.  President Bush has yet to comment on why he did not pursue this course of action in New Orleans.

Obama's vision for immigration overhaul is meeting resistance as well, as Gov. Jan Brewer has continued her support of SB1070 even after her meeting with Obama yesterday.  Despite Obama's attempt to placate anti-amnesty sentiment by moving a modest number of National Guard troops to the border, pro-Western forces in Arizona have remained staunch in their demand for a border fence.

The "change" Barack Obama represents is superficial.  The same problems that plagued the Bush administration have continued in Obama's, and similar policies, such as amnesty, have persisted as well. There is clear dissonance between the change Americans want and the change the White House has provided even before the past two years.  The time to start bringing real change to our country is now.